CASE REPORT
Adjustable Horseshoe Headrest as a Positioning Adjunct in Airway Management for a Giant Occipital Encephalocele
Habib Muhammad Reazaul Karim1, *, Muhammad Yunus2, Angkita Barman2, Sonai Datta Kakati2, Samarjit Dey2
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2017Volume: 11
First Page: 83
Last Page: 87
Publisher ID: TOATJ-11-83
DOI: 10.2174/1874321801711010083
Article History:
Received Date: 31/01/2017Revision Received Date: 13/03/2017
Acceptance Date: 08/06/2017
Electronic publication date: 29/08/2017
Collection year: 2017
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background:
Presence of a giant occipital encephalocele poses a challenge for laryngoscopy by hindering optimal positioning. Intubations in different positions, assistance and modification of table surfaces have been reported with different rates of success and complications in such cases.
Method:
We used an adjustable horseshoe headrest as a positioning adjunct in airway management in a few cases during 2015 – 2016. Four babies were positioned with the help of the horseshoe headrest for direct laryngoscopy. These cases were then compared with previously conducted one more case whose trachea was intubated by the child’s head beyond the edge after an unsuccessful attempt in lateral position.
Result:
All four cases positioned with adjustable horseshoe head rest were intubated successfully with mean 2 ± 0.81 attempts with 2.25 ± 0.5 Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view. Significant complications were absent in the cases intubated by placing the head in horseshoe headrest as compared to the case performed in lateral position followed by placing the child’s head beyond the edge of the table with assistants supporting the baby.
Conclusion:
This clinical paper discusses this infrequently reported modification, and also compares it with other positions and modifications commonly used in clinical practice.