RESEARCH ARTICLE


Nasopharyngeal Airway Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway During Diagnostic Flexible Fiber-Optic Bronchoscope in Children



Aktham Adel Shoukry*, Amr Gaber Sayed Sharaf
Lecturer of anesthesia and ICU, Anesthesia department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2164
Abstract HTML Views: 2017
PDF Downloads: 1096
ePub Downloads: 994
Total Views/Downloads: 6271
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 925
Abstract HTML Views: 799
PDF Downloads: 457
ePub Downloads: 322
Total Views/Downloads: 2503



© 2018 Shoukry and Sharaf.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Lecturer of anesthesia and ICU, Anesthesia department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, 1161, Tel: 01009506027; Email: Akhtam.shoukry1@gmail.com


Abstract

Background:

Pediatric fibreoptic diagnostic bronchoscope under general anesthesia using Supraglottic devices as Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) are one of the variable techniques used for patient’s ventilation during this procedure.

Objective:

We studied the effect of both devices on hypoxemia, the duration of the procedure, recovery time and the overall propofol consumption.

Methods:

Ninety patients of both sexes, aged 5-10 years, American society of Anesthesiology class I & II scheduled for diagnostic fibreoptic bronchoscope under general anesthesia were divided randomly into two equal groups; LMA group & NPA group, during the procedure: heart rate, non invasive blood pressure, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2), time of procedure, recovery time and total dose of propofol were measured and compared for each patient in both groups.

Results:

Hypoxemia & desaturation incidence was more in LMA group than NPA group with high significant difference (p-value 0.005). Also the duration of procedure, recovery time in PACU, and total dose of propofol consumed were significantly less in the NPA group (p< 0.001). With no difference in hemodynamic status and PaCO2.

Conclusion:

The use of NPA as supraglottic ventilating device for children undergoing diagnostic flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy is considered a good alternative for shortening the bronchoscopy time with less incidence of hypoxemia and better recovery time compared to LMA.

Keywords: Pediatric bronchoscope, Laryngeal mask airway, Nasopharyngeal airway, Hypoxemia.



1. INTRODUCTION

Pediatric bronchoscopy is defined as an endoscopic procedure to visualize the inside of the airway for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. It is most often done for children at the preschool age. It is obvious that bronchoscopic interventions necessitate a team approach and bring a major challenge for both the anesthesiologist and operator since they share and manage the patient`s airway [1, 2].

Various methods of airway management have been used to maintain and secure the airway, ranging from nasal canula, facemask to supraglottic devices and endotracheal tube, but choosing the most adequate method, considering the pathology and site of the lesion, the interventional procedure and the possible risks, is a major concern especially in children [3].

Supraglottic devices as Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) provides the possibility of positive pressure ventilation. Furthermore, being located over the larynx permits simple entry of appropriate sized fibreoptic bronchoscope, providing both possibility of seeing supraglottic and subglottic lesions with good safety margin in securing the airway during general anesthesia & deep sedation [4].

This study aimed to compare the difference between the use of LMA & NPA as a ventilating device during diagnostic fiber optic bronchoscope in children and its role in preventing hypoxemia and its impact on the duration of the procedure, recovery time and given doses of propofol.

2. PATIENT AND METHODS

This prospective randomized single blind study was conducted on ninety patients of both gender, aging between 5 and 10 years, ASA Class I & II scheduled for elective diagnostic Flexible Fiber-optic Bronchoscope (FFB) at chest department of Ain Shams University Hospitals. Primary indications were persistent or recurrent atelectasis, pneumonia, or diffuse infiltrates and diagnostic Broncho Alveolar Lavage (BAL). The participants were enrolled from June 2016 to March 2017 after the approval of the Ethical Medical Committee and obtaining a written informed consent from their parents or guardians. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (forty five in each group) using a computer-generated random number table to either Laryngeal Mask Airway group (LMA group), and nasopharyngeal airway group (NPA group).

Exclusion criteria included Parent’s refusal, ASA III or more, Intrinsic and idiopathic coagulopathy, known allergy to any of the study medications, furthermore patients were excluded if they had severe hypoxemias due to severe cardiac or lung disease.

For all enrolled patients, full history, clinical examination and routine laboratory investigations were done. Pre-induction all patients had an IV access (22 gauge peripheral canula) using EMLA cream, premedication drugs were given in the form of (midazolam 0.05 mg/kg iv, ketamine 1 mg/kg iv, dexamethasone 0.02 mg/kg iv, ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg iv & Ceftriaxon 50 mg/kg after making sensitivity test as antibiotic prophylaxis).

General anesthesia was conducted using supraglotic devices either laryngeal mask airway (LMA group) or nasopharyngeal airway (NPA group) using open circuit (modified Ayre’s T-piece), Basic monitoring including ECG, pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure applied to all patients, through the whole procedure and in the PACU.

After oxygenation using facemask with 100% FiO2 & sevofloran 2%, propofol 2 mg/kg IV was given. In LMA group we inserted laryngeal mask airway and connected it to modified Ayre’s T-piece then the FFB was introduced by a pediatric bronchoscopist through the LMA while disconnecting the circuit and local anesthetic (lidocaine 3 mg/kg) was sprayed on the vocal cord through the bronchoscope channel 2 minutes before introducing it through the vocal cords.

In the NPA group the nasopharyngeal air way was introduced to one of the nostrils and connected to modified Ayre’s T-piece circuit using endotracheal tube connector of the same size then FFB was introduced through the mouth with the aid of a bite block away from the device, thus in NPA group we didn’t disconnect the circuit all through procedure, while in group LMA we disconnected the circuit during the procedure.

Anesthesia was maintained using sevoflorane 2% in 100% FiO2 and additional IV doses of propofol 1 mg/kg per dose was titrated to deepen anesthesia avoiding child movement and coughing during the procedure when needed. Baseline arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) together with hemodynamic parameters in the form of heart rate, systolic & diastolic blood pressure was recorded every 5 minutes throughout the procedure and in the PACU.

Episodes of Desaturation (Desaturation was defined as SpO2 < or = 90%) occurred during the procedure and lowest SpO2 were recorded and managed in both groups by stopping the procedure and assisting the ventilation till SpO2 returned to normal. In LMA group we had to reconnect the circuit; however in (NPA) group, we only closed the mouth and the other nostril to assist ventilation.

To assess the effect of both techniques on hypoventilation, two Arterial Blood Gases (ABG) were done for each patient. The 1st one shortly after induction of anesthesia and the 2nd one at the end of the procedure before recovery & the difference between PaCO2 in the two samples were calculated and compared between both groups.

After recovery from anesthesia all patients in both groups were transferred to PACU and the time from arrival to PACU till discharge was recorded, patients were discharged by the anesthetist from PACU after fulfilling criteria of discharge (modified Aldret’s score ≥ 9) also the duration of the procedure was recorded & total dose of propofol during the procedure apart from the induction dose was calculated.

2.1. Statistical Methods

With respect to sample size calculation, it was calculated using PS (version 3.0.43, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, located in Nashville, United States), based upon the assumption that using nasopharyngeal airway as a supraglottic ventilating device will decrease incidence of desaturation & hypoxemia by 20% and taking power 0.8 and alpha error 0.05, a minimum sample size of 45 patients was calculated for each group.

Statistical analysis was performed using computer software statistical package for the social science (SPSS, version 20; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Description of quantitative (numerical) variables was performed in the form of mean ± SD. Description of qualitative (categorical) data was performed in the form of number of cases and percent. Chi-square (X2) test of significance was used in order to compare proportions between two qualitative parameters, independent-samples t-test of significance was used when comparing between two means, Mann Whitney U test: for two-group comparisons in non-parametric data. The significance level was set at P-value of 0.05 or less, and P-value of 0.01 or less was considered highly significant.

3. RESULTS

In this randomized, prospective, single blinded study, 90 patients were enrolled. 10 patients, 4 patients from LMA group and 6 from NPA group were excluded from the study either due to change of the technique to rigid bronchoscopy (e.g. accicentally discovered foreign body) or complications that cancelled the procedure (e.g. severe larygospasm or bronchospasm with Persistant hypoxemia that needed muscle relaxation & mechanical ventilation).

The Demographic data showed no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics as regards age, sex, weight, height & ASA classification (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic data & Perioperative Hemodynamic monitoring.
Variables measured Groups
LMA
(N=45)
NPA
(N=45)
T-test
t P-value
Age (years) 6.5 ± 2.5 7.2 ± 2.3 1.459 0.148
Sex F/M 20/25 22/23 0.179 0.637
Weight (kg) 23.7 ± 3.4 24.1 ± 2.4 0.618 0.538
Height (cm) 119.8 ± 3.5 121 ± 4.3 1.452 0.150
ASA I/II 38/7 40/5 0.385 0.535
HR (beats/min) 115.2 ± 7.5 117.3 ± 8.5 1.229 0.222
SBP (mmHg) 90.2 ± 5.2 92.5 ± 4.4 2.183 0.031*
DBP (mmHg) 50.4 ± 4.2 52.1 ± 4.5 1.868 0.065
HR, heart rate. SBP, Systolic blood pressure.DBP, Diastolic blood pressure *P < 0.05 is considered significant.

Regarding the Hemodynamic monitoring, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the heart rate and diastolic blood pressure, however the systolic blood pressure was lower with significant difference in LMA group than NPA group (Table 1)

On comparing both groups as regard desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) during procedure and the total number of patients had desaturation. The results showed that the number of patients having desaturation episodes was more in group LMA than group NPA with high significant difference (p-value 0.005) also, SpO2 dropped in LMA group to lower values more than NPA group with high significant difference (p-value < 0.001) (Table 2).

In addition, we recorded the duration of the procedure from induction till recovery between both groups. The total time of procedure was significantly less in NPA group than in LMA group (p-value < 0.001). Also the total consumption of propofol was higher in LMA group than in NPA group with statistically high significant difference (p-value < 0.001) (Fig. 1, Table 3).

Table 2. Perioperative means (SD) of peripheral oxygen saturation.
Variables Measured Groups
LMA
(N=45)
NPA
(N=45)
T-test
t P-Value
Baseline Spo2% 96.94 ± 2.57 97.18 ± 2.64 0.437 0.663
Lowest Spo2% 86.38 ± 3.53 91.72 ± 3.98 6.734 <0.001**
Change in Spo2% 11.11% 4.44%
Desaturation Patients n (%) 19(42.22%) 7(15.56%) 7.788 0.005*
Spo2, peripheral oxygen saturation, *P < 0.05 is considered significant, * P < 0.001 is considered highly significant.
Table 3. Duration of the procedure and total dose of propofol [mean (SD)].
Duration of Procedure Groups
LMA
(N=45)
NPA
(N=45)
T-test
N % N % T P-value
15 min 8 17.8 19 42.2
20 min 13 28.8 15 33.3
25 min 12 26.6 7 15.5
30 min 8 17.7 4 8.8
35 min 4 8.9 0 0.0
Total duration (Mean± SD)min 25.29 ± 3.64 18.53 ± 3.28 9.255 <0.001**
Total propofol dose mg 1505.14 ± 245.78 420.17 ± 75.38 28.311 <0.001**
*P < 0.05 is considered significant, *P < 0.001 is considered highly significant

Furthermore, we studied the effect of ventilation on the change in PaCO2 during the procedure by measuring a baseline paco2 and another sample at the end of the procedure and the change was higher in LMA group than in NPA group, but with no statistically significant difference between both groups (p-value 0.086) (Table 4)

Table 4. Mean and SD of PaCO2 changes during the procedure.
Intraoperative data Groups
LMA
(N=45)
NPA
(N=45)
T-test
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD t P-value
1st paCO2 31.52 ± 2.34 32.31 ± 2.49 1.551 0.124
2nd paCO2 50.24 ± 4.85 48.39 ± 5.27 1.733 0.086
*P < 0.05 is considered significant, *P < 0.001 is considered highly significant.

As regard time passed at the PACU to detect the effect of both techniques on the recovery time, the results showed prolonged recovery time in LMA group than in NPA group with statistically significant difference between both groups (p-value < 0.001) (Table 5).

Table 5. Mean and SD of time passed at PACU at 20,30,40,50,60 min.
Times at PACU Groups
LMA
(N=45)
NPA
(N=45)
T-test
N % N % T P-value
20 min 0 0.0 5 11.1
30 min 14 31.1 37 82.2
40 min 15 33.3 3 6.7
50 min 10 22.2 0 0.0
60 min 6 13.3 0 0.0
Total time (Mean± SD) min 41.60 ± 4.36 30.25 ± 3.15 14.155 <0.001**
Fig. (1). Graph comparing the time passed at the PACU between two groups. Bars represent Mean±SD.

4. DISCUSSION

This present study compared the use of laryngeal mask airway versus nasopharyngeal airway as alternative techniques for ventilating children undergoing diagnostic flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy. The use of NPA resulted in significant reduction in hypoxemia & desaturation episodes together with shorter procedure & recovery time using lesser doses of propofol.

One of the alternative techniques of airway management in this field is spontaneous breathing of patients using Supraglottic devices .They seems to be simple and feasible and associated with less hemodynamic and oxygenation instability [5-9]. The current study also showed no clinical relevant changes in heart rate values . However, we found that systolic blood pressure dropped more in LMA group than in NPA group, but without clinical significance, this might be related to the larger doses of propofol used in LMA group.

Previous authors have used widely variable reductions in SpO2 to define desaturation leading to significant heterogeneity. For instance, Nussbaum [10] defined desaturation as a drop in SpO2 to 65%-80%, Rodrıguez et al. [11] defined it as a drop in SpO2 of 10% or more below the baseline. In the present study, we considered a decrease in spO2 ≤ 90% as a desaturation episode. The studies of Schnapf [12] and Peng et al. [13] in oxygen desaturation during pediatric fibreoptic bronchoscopy have related the desaturation to the age and the skills of the operator. However, in the current study, since we had a single operator, we related it to the technique, we found that due to unshared airway with the same operator the NPA group had better oxygenation and significantly lesser frequency of desaturation than LMA SpO2 group (15.56% and 41.7%, respectively) also lowest SpO2 in NPA & LMA(92.63% and 3.05 & 86.41% ± 3.81, respectively). Furthermore, the bronchoscopy time was longer in group LMA than in group NPA with high significant difference (10 patients in group LMA & only 2 patients in group NPA lasted more than 30 minutes). The longer duration is assumed to be due to the repeated episodes of deoxygenation during the procedure.

It should be noted that we did not use a bronchoscopy adapter to the LMA which could be a limitation to our study since it could have resulted to an increase in episodes of desaturation on LMA group, however previous studies that used this special bronchoscopy adaptor didn’t determine its value regarding the frequency of desaturation or length of the procedure.

As a result of the lengthy procedure time in LMA group, the study showed that the overall propofol consumption during the procedure was higher in LMA group than in NPA group with high significant difference (p-value < 0.001). Yarmus et al. [14] proved that the use of LMA technique requires more depth of anesthesia. Grendelmeier et al. [15] also found that longer bronchoscopy time has higher requirements of propofol and it is safe whether used as bolus or as continuous infusion.

In order to evaluate the impact of using both techniques on hypoventilation that might occur during the procedure, we measured PaCO2 at two time intervals: the 1st post-induction; and the second just before recovery for each patient. The difference between the two samples was calculated. The increase in PaCO2 was higher in group LMA than group NPA with no significant difference (p-value < 0.086).

Diagnostic flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy is considered a day case procedure, we used modified aldret’s score with score ≥ 9 to discharge patient from PACU after recording the recovery time inside the PACU, the LMA group had longer recovery time in the PACU than NPA group (41.60 min ±4.36 & 30.25 min ±3.15, respectively). Also 31 patients in LMA group stayed more than 30 minutes in the PACU, while only 3 in NPA group, this could be attributed to longer procedure time and larger doses of propofol given to deepen anesthesia in LMA group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the use of NPA as supraglottic ventilating device for ventilating children undergoing diagnostic flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy is considered a good alternative for shortening the bronchoscopy time with less frequency of desaturation and better recovery compared with LMA ventilation technique.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The participants were enrolled from June 2016 to March 2017 after the approval of the Ethical Medical Committee and obtaining a written informed consent from their parents or guardians.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used. All clinical investigations were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] de Blic J, Marchac V, Scheinmann P, et al. Complications of flexible bronchoscopy in children: Prospective study of 1,328 procedures. Eur Respir J 2002; 20(5): 1271-6.
[2] Masters IB, Eastburn MM, Francis PW, et al. Quantification of the magnification and distortion effects of a pediatric flexible video-bronchoscope. Respir Res 2005; 6: 16.
[3] Niggemann B, Haack M, Machotta A. How to enter the pediatric airway for bronchoscopy. Pediatr Int 2004; 46(2): 117-21.
[4] Sung A, Kalstein A, Radhakrishnan P, Yarmush J, Raoof S. Laryngeal mask airway: Use and clinical applications. J Bronchol 2007; 14: 181-8.
[5] Jameson JJ, Moses RD, Vellayappan U, Lathi KG. Use of the laryngeal mask airway for laser treatment of the subglottis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123(1 Pt 1): 101-2.
[6] Chhetri D, Long J. Airway management and CO2 laser treatment of subglottic and tracheal stenosis using flexible bronchoscope and laryngeal mask anaesthesia. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 22: 131-4.
[7] Lee J, Hashmi N, Mandel J, Mirza N. Use of potassium-titanyl phosphate laser with flexible bronchoscope through a laryngeal mask airway in patients with difficult airways. Oper Tech Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg 2011; 22: 165-8.
[8] Fadaizadeh L, Hosseini MS. Laryngeal mask airway in interventional bronchoscopy for tracheal lesions. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2013; 51(3): 137.
[9] Fadaizadeh L, Hosseini MS, Dabir S. Role of laryngeal mask airway in interventional bronchoscopy procedures for upper tracheal stenosis: Case series. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2013; 22(2): 223-7.
[10] Nussbaum E. Pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy: clinical experience with 2,836 bronchoscopies. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002; 3: 171e6.
[11] Factors associated with complications caused by bronchoscopy in pediatric patients. Arch Bronconeumol 2003; 39: 501e6.
[12] Schnapf BM. Oxygen desaturation during fiberoptic bronchoscopy in pediatric patients. Chest 1991; 99: 591e4.
[13] Peng Y-Y, Soong W-J, Lee Y-S, Tsao P-C, Yang C-F, Jeng M-J. Flexible bronchoscopy as a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pediatric intensive care patients: A report on 5 years of experience. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46: 1031e7.
[14] Yarmus LB, Akulian JA, Gilbert C, et al. Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10(2): 121-6.
[15] Grendelmeier P, Tamm M, Pflimlin E, Stolz D. Propofol sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: A randomised, noninferiority trial. Eur Respir J 2014; 43(2): 591-601.